Layoffs · Primly Community

laid off as a staff engineer: why the search feels harder than it should

staff_steph · 4 replies

not a success story post. this is a 'what i'm learning during week 14' post.

i was laid off from a staff eng role in february 2026. i've had a lot of interviews, a few near-misses, and no offer yet. i'm not panicking but i want to be honest about what i'm seeing because i don't think enough senior people talk about this honestly.

the staff level hiring market is thin. there are fewer staff roles total, companies often collapse staff into senior-plus brackets for layoffs, and when there are openings they're usually for very specific domains. if you're a generalist staff eng (guilty) and the open roles want someone who has run the infra migration for a 500-person engineering org at a Series D fintech, you're going to miss often.

the interview loop is longer. staff-level interviews at decent companies have 5-7 rounds including a presentation or design proposal. the time from first call to decision is 4-8 weeks on average. if three processes are running in parallel, you are busy full-time just on interviews.

leveling is inconsistent and sometimes insulting. i've had companies offer me senior roles at a pay cut with a 'you'd be on track to get to staff in 18 months.' no. i have 12 years of experience. if you're leveling me as senior, your leveling rubric is out of sync.

what has actually moved the needle: focusing on companies where i had a warm intro, not spray-and-pray being explicit upfront that i'm interviewing for staff, not senior, to avoid wasting time narrowing focus to 3-4 companies at a time instead of 10-15

if you're a staff eng in a similar boat: the search just takes longer at this level. it's not a you problem in most cases. the pool of matching roles is smaller.

4 replies

director_dee

hiring side: staff searches really do take longer on our end too. we often have one staff role and interview 8-10 people. the calibration conversations are long. the committee needs to agree. a 6-week timeline for a staff hire is actually fast at most companies i've been at.

corp_refugee

the leveling insularity thing is real. i've started filtering at the recruiter screen. i say: 'just to calibrate, i'm expecting this role to be leveled at staff/principal, can you confirm that before we go further?' saves everyone time. the number of recruiters who don't know the leveling for the role they're recruiting for is... remarkable.

staff_steph

i've started doing exactly this. feel a little aggressive about it but turns out it's just efficient.

ml_mike

the generalist problem is brutal at staff. ML side is slightly different because the specialization is baked in but the volume of staff ML roles is also small. i've been filtering by growth stage (series B-D) because they're the ones actually building teams. at large companies staff positions often backfill someone who left, not net new.