Unilever · Primly Community

Unilever software engineer interview process, full loop: what actually happened

market_realist · 6 replies

Went through the full Unilever software engineer interview process earlier this year for a backend role on one of their digital commerce teams (London-based, hybrid). Took about 6 weeks start to finish. Sharing the breakdown because there's not much out there specifically for tech roles at consumer goods companies.

The stages:

Stage 1: Recruiter screen. Pretty standard 20-minute call. They asked about my background, confirmed I was comfortable with the hybrid setup, and explained the process. No surprises. They were actually quite responsive on email, which I appreciated.

Stage 2: Online assessment. More on this in a separate post, but it's a timed coding platform (HackerRank-style). Two problems, 90 minutes total. This is the filter stage. If you don't pass, the rest doesn't matter.

Stage 3: Technical phone screen. About an hour with a senior engineer. We went through my CV, then one medium-difficulty algorithmic problem (graph traversal, nothing exotic), then roughly 15 minutes of system design lite, mostly "how would you think about scaling this."

Stage 4: Final loop. Three back-to-back interviews over Zoom. One was coding (two problems, easier than I expected), one was a proper system design round lasting about 50 minutes, and one was behavioral. The behavioral was with a tech lead and focused heavily on cross-functional collaboration, dealing with ambiguous requirements, and how I've handled production incidents.

Overall: the process is more structured than I expected for a FMCG company. The interviewers were clearly following a scorecard. Don't walk in expecting FAANG-style difficulty, but don't underestimate the behavioral side. They care a lot about how you work with non-technical stakeholders, which makes sense given that most of their tech teams are embedded in business units.

Total time from first recruiter email to offer: 42 days. Feedback loop was decent. I got actionable notes after the phone screen, which is rare.

Happy to answer questions.

6 replies

visa_vik

Thanks for the detail. Did they ask about visa sponsorship early in the process or only later? I'm on an H1B and trying to figure out if it's worth putting in the time before raising it.

alex_design

I'm in the UK so not directly relevant, but from what I know their US roles tend to be case-by-case on sponsorship. I'd raise it with the recruiter after the first call, before the assessment stage. No point burning 90 minutes if there's a hard block.

brand_ben

Did they ask you to do both the online assessment AND a phone screen? That feels like a lot of stages for a software eng role at a consumer goods company.

ux_uma

Yeah, all four stages. They don't skip the OA even if you come in via a referral, which is kind of annoying. But the phone screen is short and the coding in the final loop wasn't brutal, so it evens out.

sre_sol

The behavioral round with a tech lead sounds interesting. Did they use a structured STAR format or was it more conversational? I always find Unilever-style competency interviews either very formal or weirdly loose.

ae_andre

Pretty structured. They had a sheet in front of them and noted things down. Questions like 'give me an example of when you had to push back on a business requirement' and 'describe a time when you had to make a call with incomplete data.' Classic competency format, just with a tech lens.