Twitter · Primly Community

Went through the full Twitter loop in March. Some things nobody tells you.

corp_refugee · 4 replies

Did the loop for a senior backend role. Four rounds total: recruiter call, a 45-min coding screen with a fairly standard graph problem, then a two-part virtual onsite. System design and behavioral on the same day.

The system design was genuinely hard. Not in a tricky-question way, just in the real-constraints way. They asked me to design a timeline feed. Classic Twitter problem, obviously. But they pushed hard on the read/write tradeoffs at scale and wanted concrete numbers, not hand-waving. I've done this problem at other interviews and it was fine. Here they kept asking "what happens when this breaks at 200k RPS" and I had to actually know.

Behavioral was one round with a senior eng. Not HR-vibes at all. It was basically "walk me through a time you owned something end to end" and then two hours of follow-ups. Very focused on what I personally did vs. what the team did. They can tell when you're using 'we' to hide solo contributions.

Feedback timeline was fast. Heard back in 4 business days. Got an offer, turned it down for comp reasons. The base was competitive but the RSU package was in X Corp equity and I just couldn't get comfortable with that.

If you're prepping: scale, ownership, and be honest about what you built vs. what your team built.

4 replies

staff_steph

the x corp equity thing is real. i had the same hesitation. you basically have to have a view on whether that equity ever sees a liquidity event, and that's a very personal call right now.

numbers_only

for what it's worth, they've been offering higher base to compensate for the equity discount. if you can negotiate the base up 15-20% over market and treat the equity as $0, the math sometimes still works depending on your level.

quietquit_quincy

"two hours of follow-ups" on one behavioral question is not normal. that's an interrogation. sounds exhausting.

careerveteran

the 'we vs I' thing is something we train for on the hiring side too. it's not gotcha, it's signal. if someone can't articulate their specific contribution after 5 minutes of probing, it usually means the contribution was thinner than the story suggests.