Went through the Replit PM loop in January 2026. Sharing the whole thing because PM interview content for them is basically nonexistent online.
I was interviewing for a product role focused on their developer-facing product (core editor + collaboration features, not the agent/Ghostwriter layer). Four rounds total.
Recruiter screen. 30 min, mostly logistics. Asked why Replit and whether I was a product user. I'd been using it on side projects so I had real answers. That genuinely helped.
Product sense round. Prompt was something like: Replit has a classroom/education use case. How would you improve the experience for a teacher managing 30 students doing live coding? Open-ended. I framed it as a discovery exercise, walked through who the user is, what they're trying to do, what the gaps are, then proposed a set of directions with trade-offs. They pushed back on prioritization. Good back and forth.
Execution / estimation. Metrics question: how would you measure the health of the collaboration feature? What leading indicators would you care about? They wanted to see that I understood the difference between output metrics and outcome metrics. Also a light estimation exercise on concurrently active repls.
Behavioral. Standard PM behavioral: tell me about a time you said no to a stakeholder, how you handled a failed feature, how you work with eng when there's disagreement on scope.
Final hiring manager chat was the most conversational. Less formal. They asked about my take on where developer tools are heading in the next 3 years, which felt like they wanted to know if I had a genuine point of view on the space.
Overall, the loop was well-structured. My offer was $155k base, mid-level PM equivalent, remote.