OpenAI · Primly Community

OpenAI data engineer interview: pipelines and SQL, here's what they actually tested

analyst_ana · 4 replies

Just finished the data engineer loop at OpenAI last month. Sharing notes while they're fresh because I couldn't find anything specific when I was prepping.

The process was: recruiter screen, then a 45-min technical phone screen, then a 4-hour onsite (3 technical rounds plus one values/culture round). The whole thing took about 5 weeks from first contact to verbal offer.

Phone screen: Focused on SQL and basic data modeling. They gave me a schema, described a business question, and asked me to write a query. The question itself wasn't insane hard, but they pushed on edge cases: what happens with nulls, how would you handle timezone differences, could this query handle 10x the data volume. If you haven't thought about query performance in a while, brush up before this call.

Onsite round 1 (data pipelines): This was the meaty one. They described a realistic data ingestion scenario, model training data at scale, and asked me to walk through how I'd build the pipeline. Things they probed: fault tolerance, idempotency, exactly-once semantics, monitoring. Airflow came up. So did whether I'd use streaming vs batch for different parts. Very practical, no trivia.

Onsite round 2 (coding + data structures): Standard-ish coding. Two LeetCode-style problems, medium difficulty. One was clearly graph-adjacent. They're not obsessing about hard problems but they want clean code and good communication. Explain your approach before you start writing.

Onsite round 3 (system design, data flavor): Design a feature store or something in that space. I got a prompt roughly like: how would you build a system to serve real-time features for model inference? Not just the happy path, they want you to discuss consistency, latency tradeoffs, schema evolution.

Values round: Behavioral and very mission-focused. Why AI safety matters to you. What responsible data practices look like in an AI context. This one actually matters at OpenAI; it's not just a formality.

Comp note: my offer for a mid-senior DE was in the range I'd expect for top-tier SF, roughly competitive with Meta/Google but with more equity upside given the company stage. Don't take the first number.

Happy to answer specifics in replies.

4 replies

ux_uma

Thanks for the breakdown. The feature store prompt in system design makes a lot of sense given what they're building. Did they expect you to know specific open-source tools (like Feast or Tecton) or was it more architecture-agnostic?

de_derek

Mostly architecture-agnostic, but mentioning tools and knowing their tradeoffs helped. I mentioned Redis for online serving and columnar storage for offline, referenced Feast briefly. They seemed to care more about your reasoning than whether you'd used their exact stack.

firsttime_mgr

The values round being non-trivial tracks. A few friends who work there have said the AI safety alignment question comes up repeatedly across roles, not just in research. If you don't actually have a thoughtful take on it, spend time forming one before you interview.

analyst_ana

Did they distinguish between MLE and DE in the loop at all? Or is it mostly the same set of rounds?