Merck · Primly Community

Merck senior system design interview: what to expect if you're at a principal or L5-equivalent level

quietquit_quincy · 5 replies

did the Merck senior SWE system design round in early 2026. took notes immediately after because the format was different from what i expected.

first, some context on leveling. Merck's internal levels don't map cleanly to L5/L6/L7 like Google or the equivalent at Meta. they call the senior IC band something like "principal" depending on the org. for what i interviewed for, they said it was equivalent to "senior" in big-tech terms, which in pharma tends to mean 7-10 YOE.

the system design prompt itself: "design a platform that ingests clinical trial data from multiple sites and makes it queryable by researchers in near-real-time." so domain-adjacent, not generic. i was glad i had some sense of what clinical trial data pipelines look like (site submissions, audit trails, regulatory constraints). if you're interviewing for health tech or regulated-industry roles at Merck, brush up on concepts like data lineage, audit logging, and why you can't just DELETE rows in regulated datasets.

what they cared about most: data ingestion at scale (streaming vs batch, they were fine with either as long as you justified) consistency vs availability tradeoffs for compliance-critical data access control. who can see what. RBAC design came up explicitly. failure modes and how you'd alert on them

what they didn't push hard on: raw latency numbers (this wasn't a low-latency trading system) CDN / front-end delivery cost optimization at massive scale (they're not AWS-scale)

the interviewer was a principal engineer, asked good clarifying questions, wasn't trying to trick me. i ran out of time before covering monitoring in depth and he just said "let's note that and move on" which felt collaborative.

one thing i'd call out: don't assume they want a pure cloud-native microservices answer. they have significant on-prem infrastructure that integrates with cloud. asking "what's the existing environment" in the design round was well-received.

total design round: 60 min. about 10 min scoping, 35 min design, 15 min Q&A. bring questions about the actual platform they're building.

5 replies

qa_quinn

the clinical trial data angle is very Merck. regulated data is its own specialty. the audit logging and data lineage requirements you mentioned are real, they come from FDA 21 CFR Part 11 compliance. if you know that framework by name it'll read well in the interview.

infra_ines

yeah 21 CFR Part 11 came up by name in the Q&A portion. i knew it just enough to not blank. definitely worth skimming before an onsite for any pharma tech role.

frontend_fran

this is super useful even for non-backend roles. i'm a frontend dev interviewing at a pharma company (not Merck specifically) and the compliance angle is something i hadn't thought about in terms of system design. access control and audit trails affect the UI layer too.

mobile_mara

did they do whiteboarding or was it shared screen/doc? remote or in-person for this round?

infra_ines

all virtual, they used a shared Google Doc. no dedicated whiteboard tool. just text-based design, which honestly i prefer. easier to annotate and reference back.