Not going to get specific but: I was asked by my manager to frame data in a way that would mislead a stakeholder. Not technically lying, but definitely misleading. Cherry-picking numbers to support a conclusion we didn't actually reach in our analysis.
I didn't say yes or no in the moment. I said I'd think about how to present it. Then I panicked.
Here's what I've been thinking through:
Option 1: Do it. Rationalize it as "just presentation" and move on. The path of least resistance. Also the option I can't actually make myself choose.
Option 2: Push back directly. Tell my manager I'm not comfortable with the framing and suggest alternatives. Risk: I don't know how she'll receive it. She's not someone who takes pushback well.
Option 3: Propose a middle path where I present the data more completely, including the parts that complicate the conclusion. Frame it as "let's show the full picture." This is probably what I'll try first.
Option 4: Escalate. Go to HR, her manager, or whoever handles this. Nuclear option. I have no idea what the company would actually do.
Option 5: Leave. Start looking now regardless of outcome, because if this is normal here, I don't want to find out the hard way.
I think I'm doing 3 first, and if that fails, 2, and if that fails, 5. I'm not willing to do 1 and I don't have enough information to do 4.
Has anyone been in a version of this? I'm specifically wondering whether escalating ever actually helps or if it just accelerates the exit.