went through a McKinsey final round in may. three partners, two cases each. sharing what felt different from what i'd read about historically.
what's changed (based on my experience + two friends who went through in Q1):
the cases are more data-heavy than they were a few years ago. they handed me a chart mid-case that i didn't expect and had maybe 60 seconds to interpret it and connect it to the question. no time to over-think. the point seems to be whether you can reason from data quickly without freezing.
the "personal experience" interview (PEI) has shifted slightly toward leadership situations with ambiguity. they don't want "here's the time i led a project." they want situations where you had to make a call with incomplete information and someone disagreed with you. the follow-up is always "why did you make that choice instead of X" where X is a reasonable alternative. you need to defend it without being defensive about it.
what hasn't changed: structure first, always. don't jump to answers. they will push back on your framework even if it's right, to see if you can hold your ground. say "let me take a moment to structure my thinking" before you start, every time.
i'm one of three from my cohort who got to final round. didn't get the offer. the feedback was that my PEI stories were strong but my case math got sloppy under pressure in the third case. i know what happened: i got tired. three tough cases in four hours is a lot.