Humana · Primly Community

Humana onsite / final round, how it really goes in 2026

backend_bekah · 5 replies

finished the Humana final round last month for a Senior Data Engineer role. 'onsite' is basically virtual now but they still call it that. sharing the breakdown because it's a slightly different shape than a pure SWE loop.

structure

4 x 45-min sessions over one full day on Teams. back-to-back with short breaks. they do it all in one day.

session 1: technical coding

got a SQL problem first. realistic healthcare data schema: members, claims, diagnoses. question was about identifying members with specific chronic condition flags who hadn't had a preventive screening in 12 months. window functions, conditional aggregation. not exotic SQL but you need to be comfortable writing it live. then a short Python problem on parsing nested JSON from an insurance API response.

session 2: system / architecture

how would you design a data pipeline to ingest claims data from multiple payer sources, normalize it, and make it available for analytics and ML features? classic ELT design. i talked about Kafka for streaming, dbt for transformation, Snowflake or BigQuery as a warehouse target, and data quality checks at ingestion. healthcare context: data contracts and upstream SLA variability matter, payer files don't always arrive on schedule.

session 3: behavioral

standard format but healthcare-flavored. questions about working with compliance teams, handling PII/PHI in pipelines, and a team conflict resolution example.

session 4: leadership / culture conversation

met with someone from the hiring manager's chain. less structured. more of a 'here's our roadmap, how would you fit in, what questions do you have' format. they definitely used this to assess maturity and how you talk about ambiguity.

overall

fair process. the day is long but they moved efficiently. got my hiring decision 8 business days after the final round. offer came with a background check contingency.

one note: they use behavioral anchors pretty rigorously. the interviewers were taking notes during my answers. structure your STAR stories cleanly.

5 replies

analyst_ana

the SQL with window functions on a claims schema is exactly what i've been practicing. do you remember if the claim date vs service date distinction mattered in the problem? that detail trips people up in healthcare data.

de_derek

yes, actually. the schema had both claimdate (when filed) and servicedate (when care was delivered). the problem was specifically about service_date for the screening logic. good catch, that is a real gotcha.

staff_steph

8 business days for a decision is reasonable. i've seen healthcare companies take 3-4 weeks post-final round while headcount approvals made their way up the chain. sounds like Humana has decent decision velocity, at least for these roles.

finance_faye

is the offer competitive for DE roles? curious about remote vs. Louisville comp and whether there's meaningful equity.

de_derek

no equity for individual contributor DE roles in my experience. they have a 401k match and an annual bonus target (10-12% for senior). base for senior DE in Louisville was around 130-145 range from what i could tell. remote roles seemed to be in the same band, they're not fully geo-adjusting. not fintech comp but solid for health payer work.