Eli Lilly · Primly Community

Eli Lilly senior / L5 system design interview: what to expect and how to approach it

staff_steph · 4 replies

Just finished the staff/senior SWE loop at Lilly (2026). The system design round was the most interesting part so writing this up separately.

First, Lilly doesn't use L1-L7 leveling publicly the way FAANG does. Internally they have bands but the job posting said 'Senior Software Engineer' and that's what the interviewers treated it as. So if you're mapping from big tech: senior at Lilly is roughly L5 equivalent scope expectations.

The system design prompt I got was along the lines of: design a real-time notification system for clinical trial alerts, where research coordinators need to know immediately if a patient's vitals go outside protocol thresholds. So it's not abstract. You're expected to know or quickly absorb domain context.

What they cared about: Reliability and fault tolerance (this is healthcare adjacent so data loss is a real concern) Scalability discussion, though at Lilly's internal scale, not Twitter scale How you'd handle monitoring and alerting for the system itself Trade-offs between push vs. pull, event streaming vs. polling Clear thinking about who the consumers are and what latency actually matters

I drew a lot on Kafka for streaming, Redis for fast threshold checks, and PostgreSQL for audit logs. They engaged well with all of it. The interviewer pushed back thoughtfully on my choice to use a separate alerting service instead of embedding it in the primary pipeline.

45 minutes goes fast. Spend the first 5-8 minutes clarifying requirements before you draw anything. That alone separated candidates in their feedback to me post-offer.

Comp for this level in Indiana: base around $138k, bonus around 12-15%, decent equity via RSUs but not FAANG levels.

4 replies

sec_sasha

Did they ask about data security at all? PHI handling in a real-time alert system is a whole conversation. Curious if they surface HIPAA concerns or leave it to you.

staff_steph

Yes, briefly. I brought it up first and the interviewer nodded and said 'good, let's note that and come back.' We did come back to it near the end. Encryption at rest and in transit, role-based access for who can see patient identifiers. They didn't go deep but they clearly expected you to raise it.

careerveteran

The 'spend 5-8 minutes on requirements' advice is underrated. I've seen so many candidates torpedo their design round by jumping straight to drawing boxes. The clarification phase is where you signal seniority.

de_derek

Healthcare real-time systems are genuinely a different beast. Kafka is the right call but I'd have also pushed on the dead letter queue strategy. Did they go there?