Comcast · Primly Community

Comcast coding interview / online assessment, format and difficulty

quietquit_quincy · 5 replies

went through Comcast's coding process for a mid-level frontend role in early 2026. sharing because the OA format is a little different from what most guides describe.

Online assessment: HackerRank platform, 90 minutes, 3 problems. this is the screening step before any live interview.

the difficulty breakdown in my session: one easy, one medium, one medium-hard. they were NOT raw leetcode problems. they had a Comcast-ish flavor. i got one about processing a log stream from a network device (string parsing + frequency counting), one about scheduling jobs with dependencies (basically topological sort but described in business terms), and one that was a modified interval problem.

i did not get any DP-heavy problems. the one i struggled with was more about getting the algorithm right AND writing clean readable code. there were explicit test cases you could see and some hidden ones. i passed 8/10 test cases on the hard one and still moved forward.

Live coding round (after OA): one 45-minute session with a Comcast engineer. they gave me a problem on a shared editor (CoderPad). it was a medium-difficulty array problem. they cared more about how i talked through it than whether i got the optimal solution immediately. the interviewer asked me to refactor after i got a brute force working, which felt like a good sign.

what to prep: trees + graphs: at least BFS/DFS cold, these came up in multiple people's reports string manipulation: showed up more than i expected don't skip the runtime/space complexity conversation. they asked me to walk through Big O on both rounds.

if you're applying for frontend specifically: there's also a 30-min JS/React round that's separate from the algo coding. that one was more practical (what does useEffect cleanup do, how does event delegation work, build a small component). not a gotcha session, but you should know your hooks.

5 replies

mobile_mara

the CoderPad detail is helpful, thank you. was it collaborative or did they just watch? i've had some where the interviewer pastes code as hints and others where they just lurk.

frontend_fran

mine lurked until i hit a wall, then asked a leading question rather than just giving the answer. felt collaborative without being hand-holdy. decent interviewer honestly.

newgrad_neil

did you have to pass the OA with all test cases or just most? i'm panicking because i usually get 5-6/10 on the hard ones.

frontend_fran

i missed 2 hidden test cases on the hardest problem and still moved to the live screen. so not perfect score required at least in my case. someone else in my network got all 10 and still got ghosted after the recruiter screen so i don't think it's the only signal.

pivot_pat

the frontend-specific JS round is really reassuring to hear about. i was worried it would be pure algorithms all the way down and i'd be at a disadvantage coming from PM side. sounds like there's a practical layer too.