i'll just post what i know since i've been asked about this twice in my DMs.
went through the citadel TPM loop for a role on their technology infrastructure team. chicago-based but the loop was fully remote.
the role framing: citadel's TPM isn't just coordination. they were explicit that they expect you to get into technical details, push back on engineering timelines with actual reasoning, and own cross-team dependency tracking for complex multi-month programs. if you're coming from a lighter project coordination background this is going to be a mismatch.
rounds:
technical screen (45 min): two questions. first was a process problem: you have five engineering teams delivering components of a new trading system, team 3 is blocked on infra from team 1, and the launch is in 6 weeks. walk me through how you manage this. they wanted specifics: what artifacts you'd create, how you'd escalate, what data you'd track.
second question was more system-knowledge: how does a load balancer work, why would you use a message queue, basic latency tradeoffs. not deep, but you need to be able to hold the conversation credibly.
onsite (4 rounds): program design: given a hypothetical initiative, design the full program structure. they wanted to see how i decompose milestones, handle risk, and communicate upward. technical deep dive: they asked me to explain a complex technical project i'd driven end to end. where did i personally add value vs. where did i rely on eng leads. behavioral: standard mix. conflict resolution, dealing with ambiguity, handling a program that was visibly going to miss deadline. exec presentation: present a program status to a hypothetical CTO. this was low-stakes simulation but they cared about how you communicated tradeoffs without hiding bad news.
comp (2026): my offer for a senior TPM was $220k base, variable bonus target around 30%. they said the bonus range was wide depending on firm performance. total package landed around $280-290k in a good year, less in a flat year.
overall: harder interview than most TPM loops i've done. they want someone who can operate closer to a technical lead than a coordinator. if you've run large-scale infra or platform programs and you can speak to technical decisions you influenced, you're probably a good fit.