Career Switchers · Primly Community

finance to tech transition: what skills transfer and what doesn't, from someone who did it

corp_refugee · 4 replies

i spent 5 years in corporate finance before moving into a technical program management role at a mid-size tech company. did it three years ago. the advice i wish i'd had:

what actually transfers

financial modeling is closer to data work than people think. if you can build a three-statement model, learn SQL and you can do business analytics work. the underlying logic, working with messy data to surface a number, is the same. the syntax is different.

executive communication. finance people present to CFOs and CEOs constantly. that skill is undervalued in tech and people notice when you have it. 'i used to present quarterly forecasts to the CFO' lands differently than 'i'm comfortable with senior stakeholders.'

process orientation. a lot of tech roles, especially in ops and program management, are desperate for people who can actually run a rigorous process. finance people know how to close the books, run a variance review, do things with consistent structure. that's not common.

what doesn't transfer (and trips people up)

the pace is different. tech move faster on product decisions. finance has longer cycles and more deliberate decision-making. i found tech surprisingly chaotic in ways i wasn't expecting.

the prestige calculus is inverted. in finance, Goldman > boutique bank > everything else. in tech, the interesting startup can be higher status than the slow-growth public company. it took me a while to recalibrate what 'good' meant.

comp structure is completely different. i left a role with a significant annual bonus and moved into a world of RSUs. the math worked out, but comparing offers requires actually modeling the equity. i built a spreadsheet for this and still refer to it.

the actual hiring path

bizops and strategy roles were my entry point. they're specifically designed for people who have business-world experience but aren't engineers. the interview loops are usually a mix of case-style and behavioral, very similar to what finance interviews look like. look for 'biz ops,' 'strategy and ops,' 'finance and ops,' 'revenue ops' at tech companies. those are your on-ramps.

fintechs specifically value the finance background and don't require as much translation. the first role might be easier to land there.

4 replies

finance_faye

the comp structure point is real and nobody prepares for it. i moved from a role with 25% target bonus to RSUs and did not understand that the RSUs had a vesting cliff, tax treatment differences, and that the 'value' in the offer letter assumes a stock price that might not hold. build the spreadsheet. don't just look at base.

ops_omar

the bizops on-ramp is legit. my team has hired several people from consulting and finance backgrounds and they often out-perform people who've been in tech longer on the business rigor side. the gap is usually product intuition, which comes with time.

director_dee

i'd add: if you're coming from finance into a tech company, be ready for much more ambiguity in your role definition. finance has clear job families and reporting lines. in tech, especially at a Series B or C, your role might be 'figure out what needs to happen and make it happen.' some people love that. others find it extremely disorienting.

corp_refugee

the ambiguity thing hit me hard in year one. i kept looking for the equivalent of 'close the books' and there wasn't one. i had to create my own structure.