Anthem · Primly Community

Anthem senior / L5 system design interview, what to expect (healthcare-specific wrinkles)

infra_ines · 5 replies

Did a senior SWE system design round at Anthem last quarter, interviewing for what would loosely map to an L5 or senior IC role. Sharing notes because the healthcare context adds wrinkles you don't usually prep for.

The prompt was something in the family of: design a system that ingests and processes health claims data at scale, then surfaces relevant info to members and their care teams. I'm paraphrasing but that's the flavor.

What they were actually evaluating, as best I could tell:

Scale reasoning. They wanted to hear you acknowledge that healthcare data volumes are large but also irregular, spiky around plan enrollment periods and end of year. How does your ingestion pipeline handle a 10x burst in January?

Data sensitivity and compliance. HIPAA came up. You don't need to be a compliance lawyer but you should know that PHI (protected health information) changes your storage and access control requirements. Bring this up proactively, don't wait for them to ask.

API design. They asked how downstream consumers would query processed claims. REST vs GraphQL discussion happened. Neither answer was wrong but they wanted to see you reason about the consumer's needs.

Ops. They asked about observability. What do you monitor, how do you know when something is wrong, what does your alerting look like? SRE mindset, not just "throw it in CloudWatch."

I did not get grilled on specific AWS services or anything proprietary. Standard distributed systems vocabulary was fine: message queues, event streaming, read replicas, caching strategies.

Two things that tripped me up a little: I initially underweighted the audit trail requirement (in healthcare you need to know who accessed what and when) and I glossed over data retention policies. Both are genuinely important in this domain, so if you prep, add those to your checklist.

Total round was 45 minutes, one interviewer. Felt collaborative, not adversarial. They steered me when I was going sideways.

5 replies

remote_swe_42

the HIPAA mention is really useful. i was going to prep my standard distributed systems design and just assumed healthcare = add encryption. sounds like there's more to it.

infra_ines

yeah, encryption at rest + in transit is table stakes. the additional layer is access logging, data minimization (don't store more than you need), and knowing which fields count as PHI. if you frame it as: i would use field-level encryption and role-based access controls with full audit logging for PHI fields, you'll sound like you've thought about it even if you're not a HIPAA expert.

corp_refugee

the claims-processing scenario is pretty much the canonical Anthem system design prompt at this point. third person i've heard it from. good that you shared specifics though, most people are weirdly cagey about it.

mobile_mara

did they ask anything about the member-facing side of the product? like mobile or web client concerns, or was it purely backend infrastructure?

newgrad_neil

this is making me realize i've basically never thought about audit trails in my system design prep. it comes up in healthcare and fintech but nobody ever teaches it. noted.